PaLM AI (PALM) Review: OG Score & Community Audit

PaLM AI deserves credit for continuing to build. Moving from a conventional AI chatbot into an AI workspace, coding assistance and developer tools gives the project a more practical direction. Root is particularly interesting because it targets actual work rather than simply offering another conversational interface.
However, the biggest question is whether people are using these tools consistently and paying enough to create meaningful revenue. PALM's original selling point includes sharing project revenue with holders, yet cant find the scale of current distributions. That leaves a gap between what the token promises and what investors can verify.
At roughly $3 million in market capitalisation, PALM is not expensive simply because it is small; it still needs evidence that its products can generate sustainable demand. It clearly haven't keep up fairly to all promises but I think it's one worth watching out for on how the next move will be from the team. The socials especially X is really active and still moving along with their community including hosting space, we see less of that from a 3 years project so kudos on that.

The project hasn't built something new it's using Google Ai for tasks and conversations so they don't have their own Ai instead using third party centralized api and The contract contains built in fee/tax mechanics visible functions like removeAllFee and restoreAllFee and a reflection based reward system this means the team has technical control over adjustable transaction fees a real centralization and trust concern basically team can increase or decrease fees.
Without their own tech the token is simply using famous Ai for hype while this ai model is much older and less useful than newly developed models, it's a risky token of team builds it's own technology and stronger roadmap then it can be much safer asset to invest.

$PALM has a weak fundamental moat. The product is largely dependent on third-party AI APIs rather than proprietary models, so changes in API pricing, access rules, or terms could directly impact the core product. That is a bad dependency for a token whose valuation is tied to AI utility. The project also faces a crowded market where Telegram/Discord AI bots can be replicated without much technical differentiation.
The token itself has already taken a ~95%+ hit from its $1.81 ATH, falling into the sub-$0.05 range while market liquidity remains thin. That makes exits increasingly difficult when larger holders sell. The bigger question is whether the revenue-sharing model actually produces meaningful, sustainable revenue or simply redistributes small amounts generated during periods of token speculation.
The main red flags are third-party API dependency, weak technological differentiation, thin liquidity, and an unproven revenue model. The AI branding sounds stronger than the underlying moat.

PaLM AI (PALM) is one of the older AI-branded crypto tokens, and it sits in the category of early AI chatbot narrative projects that launched before the current AI-agent/meta cycle got competitive. The product exists, but the narrative momentum has cooled heavily and does anyone still care enough to drive meaningful demand? I doubt not.

Palm Ai's token still runs on a hidden kill switch the owner can crank fees, mint extra coins, or freeze sells whenever they feel like it, and GoPlus flags haven't changed. Everything else they push about AI chat payouts and staking feels pointless when one wallet holds that much control. That single loophole kills it for me.

Forget price, Just think of token as a ticket to PaLM AI’s tools the more people use the AI (for chat, coding, or image generation), the more value the ecosystem has. Holding the token gives you access to perks and a slice of any on-chain revenue generated by the AI platform. It’s essentially betting on AI adoption meeting crypto incentives, gave way to see the presence then build in the web2 space as they announced their recent goals on x https://x.com/palmaierc/status/2008693899619975626