SuperWalk GRND (GRND) Review: OG Score & Community Audit

There are already tons of move to earn project and GRND is no different, these kind of project and token depend on large community as more people buy Nft and use app project grow if there is small community project and token struggle to maintain presence in crypto market. As it has no other utility except walk and earn the most of community sell free earned token creating a strong selling pressure, because of Move to earn niche is common every day new app launches same utility with different name. It's not a good investment as it force user to buy Nft and then start move to earn, community mostly keeps distance from paid earning project, hype is gone and trend is over GRND faced a massive crash due to intense selling pressure and lack of community interaction. Token and project is not completely dead the development is happening but it has enough flaw to make investors think before putting money in it.

GRND is probably not the best choice for a passive long-term investment. The token distribution is relatively mature, with most of the supply already circulating and major VC unlock pressure mostly behind it. The bigger issue is the business model itself. Since GRND exists inside a move-to-earn ecosystem, users constantly earn rewards and sell them back into the market, creating ongoing selling pressure. The token makes more sense for people actively using the app, upgrading NFT assets, or participating in the ecosystem directly rather than investors looking for long-term price appreciation alone. read more on the unlock shedule https://tokenomist.ai/superwalk

This feels like it’s slowly dying in silence. They still push tiny updates but almost nobody new shows up anymore. Only the same small group farms rewards while everyone else left, no good engagementon on x . the dead-quiet user growth in a category that crashed years ago official posts scrape single-digit likes, Reddit stays silent, and the same tiny group of farmers just prints and dumps rewards while new people stay far away. That mismatch between “still active” updates and zero fresh momentum turns the whole thing into a slow exit for whoever’s left grinding. Seen too many move-to-earn projects end exactly like this. 😩 slow rug

It’s a smart idea to turn real world movement into on-chain IP, especially with the City Protocol adding a new twist to the move-to-earn model. But Without a recent audit, the whole setup might feel too vulnerable for something that directly connects physical activity to digital rewards

They are now attempting to monetize real-world movement as on-chain IP through the City Protocol integration. This is an elegant way to turn passive users into active co-creators, injecting new life into the move-to-earn space But the entire system rests on a security audit performed in 2022. The DeFi landscape in 2025 is drastically more hostile, with exploits becoming more frequent and sophisticated. Relying on a two-year-old security review for a protocol that now ties physical movement to on-chain asset value is a massive, unmitigated risk