Market CapTotal Cryptocurrency Market Capitalization
$2.67T
2.50%
24h Vol.24 Hour Total Trading Volume
$167.54B
Dom.Bitcoin Market Dominance Percentage
58.71%
BTCBitcoin Current Live Price
$78,413.00
5.70%
ETHEthereum Current Live Price
$2,518.56
7.70%
ETH GasEthereum Network Gas Fees in Gwei
Low
Avarage
High
Data by Etherscan
Fear & GreedCryptocurrency Market Fear and Greed Index
71
Swarms SWARMS Logo

Swarms (SWARMS) Review: OG Score & Community Audit

$0.009113 0.7%
Low All Time High
$0.005508 65% 98.49% $0.6055

Overview

Swarms $SWARMS is a platform for creating scalable, production-grade multi-agent applications with advanced tools.

OG Score 23.5
Reviews 4
Market cap $9.11M
Market cap Rank #1243

Market Data & Token Stats

Fully Diluted Valuation $9.11M
24H Trading Volume $2.33M
24H Low / High $0.008755 / $0.009334
Circulating Supply 999.98M
Total Supply 999.98M
Max Supply 1.00B

Market Health Signals

Vol / MC Ratio 25.52% High
Circulating Ratio 100.00% Very High

Key Project Information

Categories Artificial Intelligence (AI) 5 more
Founder Kye Gomez
Website swarms.world Whitepaper
Socials
Chains Solana Ecosystem
Explorer Arkm 2 more
Contracts Swarms 74SBV....epump

SWARMS/USD Live Price Chart

Loading...

$SWARMS Community Sentiment

Swarms Social Audit & Score Breakdown

OG Score

Community based score. Not financial advice.
OG Score Rank #531/953
Reviews 4
Gem Score 9.0

OGAudit Coin Evaluation Metrics

Innovation 30 .9
Innovation Evaluates whether the project introduces a unique and practical solution with clear, verifiable advantages over existing alternatives, and whether the innovation has the potential to deliver measurable real-world impact beyond marketing claims.
Security 25 .6
Security Assesses the robustness of smart contract and protocol code security, including the availability, quality, and recency of audit reports. Beyond code, it evaluates overall project legitimacy by analyzing centralization risks, liquidity locks, and the likelihood of malicious behavior such as rug pulls.
Community 22 .8
Community Measures how actively the team engages and informs its community and whether governance decisions are transparent and involve on-chain voting. It also assesses whether growth is driven by genuine user interest and product adoption, rather than hype, or bot-driven activity.
Tokenomics 21 .8
Tokenomics Assesses the token's utility, distribution, and economic sustainability. It evaluates the project's revenue model, value accrual for holders, and market health metrics such as liquidity depth, volume, and the protocol TVL (Total Value Locked).
Team 20 .7
Team Evaluates the experience and credibility of the team. It also assesses partners and backers, examining whether they can meaningfully support long-term development and whether the team has sufficient resources to execute its roadmap.
Roadmap 19 .7
Roadmap Assesses the transparency and clarity of the project’s strategic roadmap. It goes beyond stated milestones by cross-referencing them with actual developer activity and releases to evaluate consistent delivery, real impact, and alignment with evolving market conditions.
How is this score calculated? [Coin Rating Methodology]

Is Swarms safe or a scam? Verified Crypto OG Reviews

Swarms Reviews

Only Verified Crypto OGs Can Rate and Review
JawadWeb3
JawadWeb3 0xFd6...A6fc2
OG Score 18.3

Swarms has already reached a point where token supply is no longer the main variable, most of the supply is already in circulation, which means future performance depends far more on whether the ecosystem can keep attracting users and builders than on token unlock schedules.
What interests me more is how much of the project's value now depends on execution, in many early stage crypto projects, tokenomics dominate the conversation because future unlocks can heavily influence price, Swarms is different, with most supply already available, growth has to come from adoption, product usage, and ecosystem expansion rather than scarcity.
At the same time, public disputes involving former contributors have created questions around governance and leadership, the market can often absorb technical setbacks, but trust issues tend to take longer to repair because they directly affect builder confidence and ecosystem participation. Recent disputes involving former contributors created uncertainty around project governance and public perception
Despite that, reports suggest user interest and ecosystem activity have continued to grow. If that trend remains intact, it would indicate that users are valuing the product itself rather than reacting solely to headlines.​​​​​​  user growth reportedly continued despite the controversy. for me, the real test is no longer token supply, it is whether adoption continues growing faster than reputation risk.

SWARMS $0.006339 Gem Score: 6.1
Faithistics
Faithistics 0xd12...ca419
OG Score 20.9

What worries me with SWARMS is that the community looks louder than the fundamentals as most of the visible traction still leans heavily on speculative AI-agent hype, while verifiable technical depth and transparent builder accountability remain thinner than the marketcap.

SWARMS $0.01863 Gem Score: 9.0
aabashweb3
aabashweb3 0x8d3...061b3
OG Score 12.5
SWARMS $0.007126 Gem Score: 1.0
Decypher
Decypher 0xd59...b2708
OG Score 42.4

Build speed really stands out here. The team ships fixes and new tools almost daily, which keeps things stable even for large agent setups. The mobile waitlist filled fast, showing real interest, and the marketplace is starting to see actual trades. Price action is slow in this noisy AI agent space, but the steady grind is building real strength. 🔥 I love the innovation here Active team outruns the pack, low entry tempts heavy here .

SWARMS $0.01427 Gem Score: 19.7

$swarms Markets

Name Pair OG Score
🚀