39.08
Pump and dump just happened recently, so is something cautious, you need to be carefull
Read full review about Mantle
aabashweb3 - OGAudit Social Auditor Profile
Bio
Social Auditor; I track what others ignore, signals, patterns, red flags. Not here for hype, only observations. Stay safe
EVM Wallet
0x8d3ee2890bc34507b075c41965dc420e9e0061b3
Status
Verified Crypto OG
Wallet Age
1197 Days of On-Chain Experience
Chains Interacted: 7 Blockchains
aabashweb3's Crypto Auditor Badges
Owned Badges:
1
Total XP:
100
Alpha OG
Wise and fair-minded
Achieved
Alpha OG
Badge 2
OG: Active member with growing reputation
Locked
Badge 2
Badge 3
OG+: Respected community contributor
Locked
Badge 3
Badge 4
OG++: Highly valued and knowledgeable member
Locked
Badge 4
Badge 5
OG+++: Long-standing trusted community pillar
Locked
Badge 5
Badge 6
OG++++: Elite status with exceptional contributions
Locked
Badge 6
Most Helpful Reviews
71.67
Let me not say much here, but if you know a father you know. Entire Crypto suffers for $BTC dumping... Buy as more as you can any time you come here you're early.
Read full review about Bitcoin
4.27
I'm calling it: Cookie DAO is a slow rug. When a project's security score is literally 5% & some group of wallet (25 wallets) controls 82% of the tokens, you aren't investing, you're donating. The anonymous devs already abandoned their main tech, leaving behind nothing but cryptic tweets and a bleeding chart. It's a hollow, copy-paste cash grab that's already collapsing.
BscScan shows 25 top holder controlling 82.00%+ of the total supply. See: https://bscscan.com/token/tokenholderchart/0xc0041ef357b183448b235a8ea73ce4e4ec8c265f?range=25
CertiK rates the project's security at a concerning 5%… Read full review about Cookie DAO
BscScan shows 25 top holder controlling 82.00%+ of the total supply. See: https://bscscan.com/token/tokenholderchart/0xc0041ef357b183448b235a8ea73ce4e4ec8c265f?range=25
CertiK rates the project's security at a concerning 5%… Read full review about Cookie DAO
16.53
Why are we still talking about a project where a handful of wallets control the entire supply? Alchemix feels like a ghost ship. The team is still pushing commits, but the hype died in 2021 and copycats have already eaten their lunch. Between the infinite token inflation and the constant, complex security scare risks, it smells like a disaster waiting to happen. Stay away from this rot.
The supply controls: https://etherscan.io/token/0xdbdb4d16eda451d0503b854cf79d55697f90c8df#balances
here are the security concerns I mentioned:
4 Key POC Vulnerability - Zero-Cost Fee Farming Attack: https:/… Read full review about Alchemix
The supply controls: https://etherscan.io/token/0xdbdb4d16eda451d0503b854cf79d55697f90c8df#balances
here are the security concerns I mentioned:
4 Key POC Vulnerability - Zero-Cost Fee Farming Attack: https:/… Read full review about Alchemix
21.95
The underlying protocol is decent, but the name-based scam exploitation and recent critical audit bugs cap any real upside for now.
Despite the okay fundamentals, serious scandals refuse to go away. The 2020 OUSD re-entrancy hack remains a giant black eye, and while a compensation plan was set up, the exploit permanently scarred trust: https://github.com/OriginProtocol/security/blob/master/audits/OpenZeppelin%20-%20Origin%20Dollar%20-%20October%202021.pdf
Even worse, in May 2024, OpenZeppelin discovered a critical bug in the buyback code that could have allowed a percentage of OUSD yields t… Read full review about Origin Token
Despite the okay fundamentals, serious scandals refuse to go away. The 2020 OUSD re-entrancy hack remains a giant black eye, and while a compensation plan was set up, the exploit permanently scarred trust: https://github.com/OriginProtocol/security/blob/master/audits/OpenZeppelin%20-%20Origin%20Dollar%20-%20October%202021.pdf
Even worse, in May 2024, OpenZeppelin discovered a critical bug in the buyback code that could have allowed a percentage of OUSD yields t… Read full review about Origin Token
Recent Reviews
7.33
The $COLLECT chart might look alive, but the supply structure is a ghost town controlled by puppet masters. When a team hoards 91% of the tokens and systematically coordinates multi-sig transfers to exchanges, the music is about to stop. They control the float, they control the narrative, and they own your liquidity. It has the exact same toxic energy as the worst copy-paste cash grabs of the last bull run. Skip this garbage; there is absolutely zero organic community vibe here.
As highlighted in Naeven's tweet from May 15, 2026: https://x.com/i/status/2055189150807269651
Read full review about Collect on Fanable
17.02
Let's be real about AtomOne ($ATONE). This isn't just a playful fork; it's a direct, ideological middle finger from Cosmos co-founder Jae Kwon aimed at the original Cosmos Hub over governance disputes and what he saw as a dilution of the core staking model.
The biggest, immediate red flag is the infinite max supply for ATONE. It’s clearly stated that ATONE is meant to be a pure staking token and is "allowed to freely inflate" between 7% and 20%. While designed to encourage staking, this is an economic design choice that means there's no mathematical supply limit. It was a point of deep divisi… Read full review about AtomOne
The biggest, immediate red flag is the infinite max supply for ATONE. It’s clearly stated that ATONE is meant to be a pure staking token and is "allowed to freely inflate" between 7% and 20%. While designed to encourage staking, this is an economic design choice that means there's no mathematical supply limit. It was a point of deep divisi… Read full review about AtomOne
17.25
This is a centralization nightmare. You’ve got a unified data layer where nearly 80% of the power sits in ten seats. It’s the opposite of everything Web3 is supposed to be. The roadmap is a generic checklist of cross-chain promises that never seem to land with any impact, Band feels like it’s just vibrating in place, hoping nobody notices the whales own the house. Stay away unless you like being at the mercy of fourteen people. 22% team allocation plus a 7–20% inflationary staking model, compounded by 97% top-100 concentration. This is the critical failure: https://etherscan.io/token/0xba11d00…
Read full review about Band
23.80
Not exactly a meme coin, but when a stablecoin starts acting unstable in more ways than one, it’s time to take a hard look. I’ll cut straight to it: USDP is not in a good place. While it has a regulated framework and is issued by Paxos (the same team behind PayPal’s PYUSD), recent months have revealed cracks that push it toward the higher-risk end of the stablecoin spectrum. Paxos is still a NYDFS-regulated trust company, is the issuer of PYUSD, and has KPMG attestations for past reserves. That's more regulatory heft than most, but it’s currently not enough to offset the noise. USDP might be s…
Read full review about Pax Dollar
3.13
The community here is a total myth. You’ve got a massive crowd of tiny holders owning less than 0.01% while the whales sit on everything. It feels rigged because it is. Palladium has all the hallmarks of a low-effort rug, no dev history, a shady registrar, and zero organic engagement. It’s just another bland, centralized token masquerading as the future of finance. I wouldn’t touch this with a ten-foot pole. Everything about the vibe says run. Top 5 wallets hold 98.41% of supply, making this effectively a centralized token with no distribution to actual users: https://etherscan.io/token/0xfc8d…
Read full review about Palladium Network
aabashweb3's Crypto Watchlist
| Name | OG Score | 24H | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |
53.21 |
0,35% |
$0.03413 |
|
| #2 |
38.02 |
0,31% |
$0.1140 |
|
| #3 |
32.58 |
2,29% |
$0.01250 |
|
| #4 |
43.56 |
0,09% |
$1.33 |
|
| #5 |
39.11 |
3,49% |
$1.83 |
|
| #6 |
24.71 |
1,93% |
$0.02628 |
|
| #7 |
39.33 |
4,29% |
$0.2941 |
|
| #8 |
21.55 |
2,84% |
$0.02612 |
|
| #9 |
32.76 |
0,84% |
$0.01372 |
|
| #10 |
42.26 |
1,50% |
$17.05 |
|
| #11 |
32.56 |
0,99% |
$0.03531 |
|
| #12 |
14.67 |
0,85% |
$0.009010 |
|
| #13 |
7.73 |
0,00% |
$0.06684 |
|
| #14 |
32.65 |
0,79% |
$0.06929 |
|
| #15 |
35.10 |
9,16% |
$0.002170 |
|
| #16 |
54.73 |
0,16% |
$0.9501 |
|
| #17 |
46.45 |
0,05% |
$0.3975 |
|
| #18 |
38.75 |
4,87% |
$0.1470 |
|
| #19 |
43.89 |
5,17% |
$0.2086 |
|
| #20 |
42.96 |
0,57% |
$0.1052 |
|
| #21 |
N/A |
2,99% |
$0.03457 |
|
| #22 |
25.11 |
3,49% |
$0.1333 |
|
| #23 |
45.50 |
6,30% |
$51.37 |
|
| #24 |
52.67 |
2,05% |
$1.65 |
|
| #25 |
60.02 |
0,16% |
$395.10 |
|
| #26 |
62.08 |
0,22% |
$2,118.17 |
|
| #27 |
71.45 |
0,52% |
$77,118.00 |
![MANTRA [Old] Logo](https://img.ogaudit.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=30,height=30,fit=cover,quality=85,format=webp/coins/mantra-dao.png){kind=small}
